About 5000 officers and soldiers died pushing back intruding Pakistani soldiers from the heights of the Himalayas during the Kargil War. But 10 years after,The politics over the Kargil war is refusing to die down..... After almost politically distancing itself all through the years from the Kargil victory, the UPA government has now begun to embrace the victory at Kargil.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh led the country yesterday in paying homage to the martyrs of Kargil war. However, two services’ chiefs did not attend the ceremony to mark the 10th anniversary of the victory, indicative of the importance, or lack of it, being attached to it by the UPA government. Both of them had some other engagements and sent their deputies in their place to accompany the Prime Minister, who led the country in paying tribute to the martyrs.
Unlike other war victories in the past, the victory in Kargil has become a political issue between the BJP and the Congress...... so much so that the Congress MP Rashid Alvi went on to remark that victory in Kargil was a victory for the BJP and, therefore, Congress had nothing to do with it. One can’t forget the fact that the Congress party boycotted the then Defence Minister George Fernandes in parliament over the coffin scam during the Kargil war. Kargil war, for some strange reasons, has come to be bracketed with the BJP, unlike victories of 1965 and 1971.
Politics over Kargil War
Made Popular Jul 27 2009
India :
Add your Comment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 









Kargil war itself was the result of political motives of the BJP. If government had worked timely so many soldiers could not have lost their lives.
The Kargil war was seen as the outcome of a massive intelligence failure. These problems with intelligence are by no means specific to India: they can be observed in cases of intelligence failure across countries. It might be useful to view intelligence performances not as success or failure but as a “batting average” over time.