
The movie “Slumdog Millionaire” made India proud at the Oscars and has also put the slums of the country before the world’s audience. Does government have a policy to deal with the actual issue of ever-increasing slums and the concerned problems?Even as the ‘movie on the slums’ made a huge success at the Oscars. It was another day of hard scribble existence for the people in slums, living with a hope that the movie would stir government into action.
As per the 2001 Census the slum population constitutes four percent of the total population of the country. Total Slum Population returned as per provisional results of Census of India 2001 was 40,605,418, comprising of 22.76% of the total urban population of the cities/towns reporting slums. This means that almost quarter of Indian cities live in slums. And sadly 5,531,062 (5 million) of this population are young children (0-6 age group).
The numbers for the richest state in India, Maharashtra are even worse. Almost 32% of the state’s population live in slums. And 5 million (5,823,510 to be precise) are in the financial capital of India, Mumbai. About 49% of Mumbai’s population live in slums
And these figures are ever growing. And hopes for a concrete shelter for these slum-dwellers, depends on the Government.
One of the problems associated with urban growth is the increase in the proportions of slums especially in metros, as people migrate from rural poorer sections in search of work. Subsequently, living in these congested and degraded spaces within cities. The rights of slum-dwellers to shelter, basic amenities have been marginally addressed till date.
To make light of their living conditions is just asinine, if you really want to humble yourself why not try living one day there - without proper water, electricity and commodes.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/05/10/news/Riis.php
In remembrance of New York past
By Sam Robert
NEW YORK: ’The most pitiful victim of city life is not the slum child who dies, but the slum child who lives,” Jacob Riis wrote a century ago. ”Every time a child dies, the nation loses a prospective citizen, but in every slum child who lives the nation has a probable consumptive and possible criminal.”
Riis’s photographs of slum life were primitive, but they seared New York’s conscience. Many of the worst slums were razed. Stricter safety and health standards were imposed. But slum clearance, by itself, also reduced the supply of affordable housing. And raising standards meant higher rents. So 70 years ago, New York City initiated another alternative: the first U.S. public housing program. First Houses opened on the Lower East Side in 1935.
Now, a collection of 35,000 to 40,000 before-and-after photos, taken mostly by staff photographers for the New York City Housing Authority and recently discovered in a city warehouse, chronicles the grim living conditions in the slums, the destruction of their tenements and the birth of the public housing developments that replaced them.
”It’s an image of the city we never thought we had,” said Dr. Richard Lieberman, director of the LaGuardia and Wagner Archives at LaGuardia Community College in Queens. The archive, which is the repository for Housing Authority records, has organized the photos and made them available on its Web site, www.LaGuardiaWagnerArchive.lagcc.cuny.edu.
”The first thing you walk away with is, what was the definition of slums,” Lieberman said. ”Wow, that was a slum? That, for me was the first startling thing. Those definitions are subject to time and place. People would spend a lot of money today trying to recreate some of those furnishings. And it’s the documentation of what gets cleared away in addition to the structures: family life, interiors.”
Over the years, the demand for public housing typically exceeded the supply, and some of ”the projects,” as they came to be called, deteriorated into forbidding, high-rise slums. Still, for millions of working-poor New Yorkers, public housing provided a haven from the dark, dank firetraps where they would otherwise have found themselves.
Many of the photos are mundane, taken not for artistic purpose but purely for documentation. They were, in effect, the next chapter in the city’s decision in 1901 to photograph every tenement in Manhattan as evidence against landlords whose buildings were considered substandard.
Bob Shamis, the curator of photographs at the Museum of the City of New York, describes the archive as ”workmanlike.” He likens some of the photographs to Riis’s, which, he says, were also more important for their content than for their quality.
Unlike Europe, the United States had no history of public housing, but Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia established the Housing Authority. At the heart of the authority ”beat the spirit of the settlement house and its ethos of social uplift,” Thomas Kessner, a City University historian, wrote in his biography of LaGuardia.
The mayor harnessed New Deal dollars to build model apartments on the Lower East Side, in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, and in other neighborhoods.
”The housing program, like so many others, developed backwards out of a search for places to spend money,” Kessner wrote. ”The goal was jobs, not houses.”
The collection of photographs ”constitutes one of the largest assemblages of interior views of how average New Yorkers lived in the 1930s and 1940s,” Joel Schwartz, a history professor at Montclair State University in New Jersey, writes in an introduction to the online archive. ”They reveal some of the most decrepit and forlorn images of New York in the 1930s and 1940s, along with glimpses of what appears to be decent, viable housing and neighborhoods that also met the fate of the wrecking ball - sacrificed for the broad-brush clearance that made low-income housing possible.”
Undoubtedly, the difference between rich and poor is growing in india at alarming rate.
india is full of poverty, and pollution, and sadness.
add a storyline and start making a movie about morocco now or something.
I don’t know why you foreigners misunderstand our slums, povert etc? You either see it through what your own slums are like or u r ignorant.The Slumdog Millionaire selectively showed the negativities of a slum life alone.
Local Opinions (4)
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/05/10/news/Riis.php
In remembrance of New York past
By Sam Robert
NEW YORK: ’The most pitiful victim of city life is not the slum child who dies, but the slum child who lives,” Jacob Riis wrote a century ago. ”Every time a child dies, the nation loses a prospective citizen, but in every slum child who lives the nation has a probable consumptive and possible criminal.”
Riis’s photographs of slum life were primitive, but they seared New York’s conscience. Many of the worst slums were razed. Stricter safety and health standards were imposed. But slum clearance, by itself, also reduced the supply of affordable housing. And raising standards meant higher rents. So 70 years ago, New York City initiated another alternative: the first U.S. public housing program. First Houses opened on the Lower East Side in 1935.
Now, a collection of 35,000 to 40,000 before-and-after photos, taken mostly by staff photographers for the New York City Housing Authority and recently discovered in a city warehouse, chronicles the grim living conditions in the slums, the destruction of their tenements and the birth of the public housing developments that replaced them.
”It’s an image of the city we never thought we had,” said Dr. Richard Lieberman, director of the LaGuardia and Wagner Archives at LaGuardia Community College in Queens. The archive, which is the repository for Housing Authority records, has organized the photos and made them available on its Web site, www.LaGuardiaWagnerArchive.lagcc.cuny.edu.
”The first thing you walk away with is, what was the definition of slums,” Lieberman said. ”Wow, that was a slum? That, for me was the first startling thing. Those definitions are subject to time and place. People would spend a lot of money today trying to recreate some of those furnishings. And it’s the documentation of what gets cleared away in addition to the structures: family life, interiors.”
Over the years, the demand for public housing typically exceeded the supply, and some of ”the projects,” as they came to be called, deteriorated into forbidding, high-rise slums. Still, for millions of working-poor New Yorkers, public housing provided a haven from the dark, dank firetraps where they would otherwise have found themselves.
Many of the photos are mundane, taken not for artistic purpose but purely for documentation. They were, in effect, the next chapter in the city’s decision in 1901 to photograph every tenement in Manhattan as evidence against landlords whose buildings were considered substandard.
Bob Shamis, the curator of photographs at the Museum of the City of New York, describes the archive as ”workmanlike.” He likens some of the photographs to Riis’s, which, he says, were also more important for their content than for their quality.
Unlike Europe, the United States had no history of public housing, but Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia established the Housing Authority. At the heart of the authority ”beat the spirit of the settlement house and its ethos of social uplift,” Thomas Kessner, a City University historian, wrote in his biography of LaGuardia.
The mayor harnessed New Deal dollars to build model apartments on the Lower East Side, in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, and in other neighborhoods.
”The housing program, like so many others, developed backwards out of a search for places to spend money,” Kessner wrote. ”The goal was jobs, not houses.”
The collection of photographs ”constitutes one of the largest assemblages of interior views of how average New Yorkers lived in the 1930s and 1940s,” Joel Schwartz, a history professor at Montclair State University in New Jersey, writes in an introduction to the online archive. ”They reveal some of the most decrepit and forlorn images of New York in the 1930s and 1940s, along with glimpses of what appears to be decent, viable housing and neighborhoods that also met the fate of the wrecking ball - sacrificed for the broad-brush clearance that made low-income housing possible.”
Undoubtedly, the difference between rich and poor is growing in india at alarming rate.
I don’t know why you foreigners misunderstand our slums, povert etc? You either see it through what your own slums are like or u r ignorant.The Slumdog Millionaire selectively showed the negativities of a slum life alone.
Global Opinions (4)
To make light of their living conditions is just asinine, if you really want to humble yourself why not try living one day there - without proper water, electricity and commodes.
india is full of poverty, and pollution, and sadness.
add a storyline and start making a movie about morocco now or something.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 





